<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinkedIn® Groups Adds New Subgroups Feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fillthefunnel.com/2009/06/24/linkedin-announces-subgroups-feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fillthefunnel.com/2009/06/24/linkedin-announces-subgroups-feature/</link>
	<description>Web Tools &#38; Strategies to Increase Sales</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 04:11:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier Taupin</title>
		<link>http://www.fillthefunnel.com/2009/06/24/linkedin-announces-subgroups-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier Taupin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fillthefunnel.com/?p=533#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Dear Miles,

You are so right in your analysis.

I have six large Groups (including Linked:HR you mentioned in your blog) and have asked the Members of all these Groups to tell me which subgroups I need to create first.

The possibilities are endless and this will be certainly one of the successful features in Groups. This said there are still a lot we don&#039;t know: Is there a limit in the number of sugroups? Are these subgroups included  in the 50-Group limit? I also want to understand more about the rights of the subgroup managers.

I don&#039;t want to make any mistakes and will take a few days before starting creating my first subgroups. One think I know is that it will increase our work load but this also will increase dramatically the quality of our Groups.

Just like Doyle, I am still scratchinh my head!

Olivier Taupin
Founder, Linked:HR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Miles,</p>
<p>You are so right in your analysis.</p>
<p>I have six large Groups (including Linked:HR you mentioned in your blog) and have asked the Members of all these Groups to tell me which subgroups I need to create first.</p>
<p>The possibilities are endless and this will be certainly one of the successful features in Groups. This said there are still a lot we don&#8217;t know: Is there a limit in the number of sugroups? Are these subgroups included  in the 50-Group limit? I also want to understand more about the rights of the subgroup managers.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to make any mistakes and will take a few days before starting creating my first subgroups. One think I know is that it will increase our work load but this also will increase dramatically the quality of our Groups.</p>
<p>Just like Doyle, I am still scratchinh my head!</p>
<p>Olivier Taupin<br />
Founder, Linked:HR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doyle Slayton</title>
		<link>http://www.fillthefunnel.com/2009/06/24/linkedin-announces-subgroups-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Doyle Slayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fillthefunnel.com/?p=533#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kudos Miles!

I must admit that I&#039;m still scratching my head over the decision to add subgroups.  I think there are so many other group management tools that need to be added before a subgroup option becomes valuable.  Here are a few examples:

1.  A tool that allows the group manager review &quot;spam like&quot; posts prior to posting.

Let&#039;s say a group manager decides that only &quot;discussions&quot; are allowed in the discussions forum... that means no re-direct links allowed in that section of the forum... if someone attempts to post anything containing a link, it goes straight to the spam cue for editing/approval.

2.  Another option would be to have a new &quot;tab&quot; for Events.  Members would be allowed to promote events, along with the date and time, in this section of the group.  When the event is in the past, it is automatically removed from the calendar.

I could go on and on but I&#039;ll keep it to those two examples for now.

Maybe I&#039;m seeing it wrong, but it appears to me that Subgroups are nothing more than another group within the group.  So basically, it becomes another &quot;room&quot; for the group manager(s) to have to moderate and manage.

At this point, I say &quot;no thank you,&quot; and will keep SalesBlogcast.com Group to only one main group.

Thanks again!

Doyle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kudos Miles!</p>
<p>I must admit that I&#8217;m still scratching my head over the decision to add subgroups.  I think there are so many other group management tools that need to be added before a subgroup option becomes valuable.  Here are a few examples:</p>
<p>1.  A tool that allows the group manager review &#8220;spam like&#8221; posts prior to posting.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say a group manager decides that only &#8220;discussions&#8221; are allowed in the discussions forum&#8230; that means no re-direct links allowed in that section of the forum&#8230; if someone attempts to post anything containing a link, it goes straight to the spam cue for editing/approval.</p>
<p>2.  Another option would be to have a new &#8220;tab&#8221; for Events.  Members would be allowed to promote events, along with the date and time, in this section of the group.  When the event is in the past, it is automatically removed from the calendar.</p>
<p>I could go on and on but I&#8217;ll keep it to those two examples for now.</p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m seeing it wrong, but it appears to me that Subgroups are nothing more than another group within the group.  So basically, it becomes another &#8220;room&#8221; for the group manager(s) to have to moderate and manage.</p>
<p>At this point, I say &#8220;no thank you,&#8221; and will keep SalesBlogcast.com Group to only one main group.</p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
<p>Doyle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Soucie</title>
		<link>http://www.fillthefunnel.com/2009/06/24/linkedin-announces-subgroups-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Soucie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fillthefunnel.com/?p=533#comment-166</guid>
		<description>I like the concept of subgroups.  I believe it will make the groups more effective especially the large ones.  More leaders will become engaged, and you may even be able to find a thread of conversation much easier.

I hope to be a sub group leader on some that participate in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the concept of subgroups.  I believe it will make the groups more effective especially the large ones.  More leaders will become engaged, and you may even be able to find a thread of conversation much easier.</p>
<p>I hope to be a sub group leader on some that participate in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.fillthefunnel.com/2009/06/24/linkedin-announces-subgroups-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fillthefunnel.com/?p=533#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Miles,
Thanks for sharing the great news and your thoughts.  Several of my clients (and a few freidns) are going to be happy when I point them to this post. One example is a staffing firm that has offices all along the West Coast as well as two separate categories of clients.  Another is a real estate brokerage with a similar configuration.  I can see how there would be a desire to keep everyone together for global information and also have an easy way to segregate for more regional needs.

Again... thanks!

Brent Jordan
Brent@BrentOnLinkedin.com
http://www.LinkedinSeattle.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miles,<br />
Thanks for sharing the great news and your thoughts.  Several of my clients (and a few freidns) are going to be happy when I point them to this post. One example is a staffing firm that has offices all along the West Coast as well as two separate categories of clients.  Another is a real estate brokerage with a similar configuration.  I can see how there would be a desire to keep everyone together for global information and also have an easy way to segregate for more regional needs.</p>
<p>Again&#8230; thanks!</p>
<p>Brent Jordan<br />
<a href="mailto:Brent@BrentOnLinkedin.com">Brent@BrentOnLinkedin.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.LinkedinSeattle.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.LinkedinSeattle.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
